English (United Kingdom)Español (spanish formal Internacional)Deutsch (DE-CH-AT)

MUNICIPAL WASTE WATER TREATMENT

 

Successful Applications of Bioaugmentation for Reducing Sludge Output from Biological Wastewater Treatment Plants and Anaerobic Digestors”

by

Mark J. Krupka, Ecological Laboratories, Inc.

Abstract

One of the major costs associated with the operation of biological wastewater treatment is the handling and disposal of sludges generated primarily in the conversion of soluble organics as measured by BOD/COD into either carbon dioxide (aerobic) or methane (anaerobic), water and bacterial cells. Often times the sludge generated in either of these processes may be subsequently treated in a digestor to reduce the volatile suspended solids (VSS) volume for disposal. Bioaugmentation with certain microbial consortia has been shown to lower the generation of solids in both aerobic and anaerobic wastewater processes by reducing the yield coefficient (γ), as well as enhancing the efficiency of digestors designed to reduce the volume of solids for disposal.

This paper will detail the use of ACF-32, a liquid microbial product, which has been shown to reduce the generation of sludge in: aerobic biological wastewater systems in Austria and Holland; and, to improve the efficiency of anaerobic digestors in Korea, Israel and Colombia. Sludge reduction ranged from 15% to almost 40% and was observed in all applications. In some cases, the improved system efficiency allowed the system to handle additional loadings without physical expansion; while generating significant savings in handling, chemical usage and disposal costs over and above the cost for bioaugmentation. In addition to presenting the statistical data this paper will also propose biochemical mechanisms for how these results are achieved through an analysis of the biochemical processes involved in all of these systems.

Keywords: Aerobic biological treatment, anaerobic biological treatment, anaerobic digestor, bioaugmentation, sludge handling and disposal costs, and sludge reduction.

Background

Since the development of the activated sludge process, suspended growth biological wastewater treatment systems have become the predominant form of secondary treatment for removal of dissolved organics. The primary reason for this is that these systems are generally the most economical way to treat large quantities of polluted water with respect to organic removal.

In aerobic biological processes, the dissolved organics are converted to carbon dioxide, water and bacterial cells according to the following equation:

BOD + N + P + O2 --------------- CO2 + H2O + Cells

Or, in anaerobic processes:

BOD or cells ------------- CH4 + H2S + H2O + N + P + cells

The excess cells that are produced are primarily what comprise the waste sludge, which must be disposed. Many processes have been developed that are designed to reduce the amount of sludge for disposal through breakdown or digestion of the sludge and increasing the dry solid weight of the sludge to further lower the volume of sludge for disposal. Very little attention has been paid to the potential for manipulation of the biomass characteristics to reduce the amount of sludge produced to begin with or to improve the efficiency of digestors.

In 1999, Ecological Laboratories was approached by the City of Pusan in Korea about the use of one of it’s bacterial products to improve the efficiency of it’s anaerobic digestors, which were functioning at 70% of design efficiency based on volatile suspended solids (VSS) reduction. While a version of the product had been used in septic tanks, primarily an anaerobic environment, with good success, the product had not been applied to commercial size anaerobic digestors. Pilot studies were conducted in 5,000-liter pilot reactors that remained from the original design work on the digestors. With encouraging results achieved in the pilot trials, field trials were later pursued. Based on successful results at Pusan similar field trials were run in Colombia and at the Hod Hasharon, as well as the Jerusalem Wastewater Plants in Israel.

In another application of the product at Deutsch Wagram in Austria, a bioaugmentation program was conducted in 1998 to reduce odors, improve breakdown of oil & grease, and reduce the amount of waste sludge generated at the plant. Based on the success at Deutsch Wagram a trial was undertaken at the municipal wastewater plant in Zutphen, the Netherlands.

Results

City of Pusan

In the pilot trials for the City of Pusan, a 20% improvement was observed in the reduction in VSS. Based on these results, the full-scale reactors were augmented as follows:

ACF-32 Application Program

Day

Tank 1

Tank 2

Tank 3

Tank 4

Total

1

6 gal.

4 gal.

3 gal.

4 gal.

17 gal.

4

6 gal

4 gal.

3 gal.

4 gal.

17 gal.

7

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

10

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

13

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

16

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

19

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

22

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

25

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

28

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

31

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

34

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

37

3 gal.

2 gal.

1.5 gal.

2 gal.

8.5 gal.

Maintenance (2x/wk)

1.5 gal.

1 gal.

0.5 gal.

1 gal.

Total first 37 days =

127 1/2 gallons

Annual Maintenance =

416 gallons

Within 90 days the VSS reduction went from 70% of design efficiency to 130% of design efficiency. The plant has continued to use the product with the exception of one year during which an alternate product from a Japanese supplier was used and the plant efficiency returned to the 70% VSS reduction efficiency observed prior to the bioaugmentation with ACF-32. The following year when the ACF-32 was again added, the digestors again resumed the 130% VSS reduction observed the first time with the ACF-32.

Deutsch Wagram

The waste water entering the sewage work at the supply tank is lifted up with screw pumps to the level of the sewage work and passes through a bar screen. A mechanical scraper removes coarse matter removed from the waste water. Then, the wastewater flows through the circular degritter where granular components are separated. Through a distributor structure the mechanical pre-cleaned waste water enters the activated sludge tank with a capacity of 1440 m3. The biological treatment is carried out by the activated sludge process. To cover the oxygen demand, air is supplied with cage rotor aerators into the waste water. In the secondary settling tank, with a capacity of 2.300 m3, the sludge settles down and is separated from the wastewater, treated biologically, then discharged to the receiving water (Rußbach). Through a siphon pipe the settled sludge enters the sludge recycling pump station. With screw pumps the sludge is pumped back into the activated sludge tank.

The quantity of water for a population equivalent of 8.200 is treated in the activated sludge tank, designed for a population equivalent of 6.000. The chemical cleaning is carried out with the addition of iron salts to precipitate phosphorous from the wastewater and is removed with the excess sludge from the process. Nitrates can be removed (denitrification) with high efficiency from the wastewater when operated with that objective. The sludge is thickened in the sludge storage tank and the sludge liquor pumped back into the supply tank. The thickened sludge either can be directly used in agriculture or the produced sludge granulate is scattered on the fields after de-watering with a sludge press.

The plant is operated by an O&M firm from the Netherlands. Located close to a residential area, the plant had regular problems with odors and oil & grease buildup in the headworks and aeration basins despite achieving better than 95% reduction for BOD and TSS. In addition, the plant was expending a significant portion of its operating budget for sludge handling and disposal.

A bioaugmentation program was implemented in 1998 for a period of one year to determine if the bioaugmentation program could consistently reduce the amount of sludge generated in the plant. Improving odors and oil and grease breakdown were secondary objectives but were not considered to be enough on their own to justify the cost of product treatment, approximately US $30,000/year.

Wastewater Plant at Deutsch-Wagram

Table 1. Average of some main parameters from the annual report of 1997

parameter
average / year
unit

degradation eff.

Waste water / d

1320

m3/Tag

-

Sludge volume

810,2

ml/l

-

BSB5: supply

286,3

mg/l

-

BSB5: discharge

5,4

mg/l

98,0 %

CSB: supply

574,5

mg/l

-

CSB: discharge

39,1

mg/l

92,5 %

NH4-N: supply

47,5

mg/l

-

NH4-N: discharge

1,4

mg/l

97,0 %

NO3-N: supply

33,2

mg/l

 

NO3-N: discharge

4,8

mg/l

85,5 %

PO4-P: supply

5,6

mg/l

-

PO4-P : discharge

0,5

mg/l

91,4 %

Dosage Schedule for ACF-32 in the Sewage Work of Deutsch-Wagram:

Dosages were recommended based on loading (COD; BOD5, resp. hydraulic loading) degradation efficiency, problem zones and working capacity.

Dosage schedule for the sewage works of Deutsch-Wagram was developed based on the use of given parameters from operation readings.

Dosage schedule:

1 US gallon = 1 bottle = 3,7853 liter gallons per month

Initial: 6 gallons

Next four weeks (once per week): 1,5 gallons 6

Maintenance (once per week): 1 gallon 2

 

Before initial inoculation, 2 gallons of ACF-32 were applied in the pump station, supply tank, and secondary settling tank. The addition was carried out either by direct applying or spraying in a dilution of 1:10 to 1:50 with water in a water can.

 

 

Initial treatment, start on 1st April

1st April 1998, ¼ gallon was applied on the floating layer and the sidewalls of the supply tank near the pump screw in a dilution of 1:10 with water. 4 gallons were applied into the activated sludge tank. On the floating layer of the secondary settling tank ¾ of a gallon was sprayed in a dilution of 1:10.

On April 2.1998, at 3 a.m. 1 gallon was added at the pump station.

Next four weeks once per week:

9.4.1998 1 gallon was added into the activated sludge tank

17.4.1998 1 gallon was added into the activated sludge tank

23.4.1998 1 gallon was added into the activated sludge tank

        1. 1 gallon was added into the activated sludge tank

Maintenance once per week:

8.5.1998 ½ gallon was added into the activated sludge tank

13.5.1998 ½ gallon was added into the activated sludge tank

20.5.1998 ½ gallon was added into the activated sludge tank

        1. ½ gallon was added into the activated sludge tank

...

...

6.8.1998 ½ gallon...

If required (based on seasonally high flow rates) at the pump station, into the supply tank and into the secondary settling tank ACF-32 is applied additional.

After collecting one full year’s worth of data, it was determined that for the year, under slightly higher flow and organic loading, that the plant had generated 34% less sludge for handling and disposal, reducing the cost for chemical treatment as well as for transportation and disposal. Additional benefits included improved solids settling characteristics as reflected by the SVI, reduction of the odors from the plant and a significant reduction in the oil & grease buildup.

Table 2. Sludge pressing results: without 24.7.98-1.8.98; with ACF-32 9.12.-17.12.98

Duration of pressing

volume of raw sludge

t

TS- of press-cake

%

press-cake

t

28.7.-1.8.97

2083 m3

26

270,18

24.7.-1.8.98

1330 m3

31

178,12

- 2 day

- 753 m3

+ 19 absolute

- 92,06

1.12.-10.12.97

2065 m3

25

208,41

9.12.-17.12.98

1529 m3

27

194,46

- 1 day

- 536 m3

+ 8 absolute

-13,95

Sludge handling and disposal costs were reduced by US $160,000 resulting in a net operating cost savings of US $130,000.

Figure 2 – SVI Data from Deutsch-Wagram

Zutphen

In March, 2006 the City of Zutphen in the Netherlands initiated a 120-day trial augmentation program. Zutphen is a medium sized activated sludge system treating an average of 6,600 M3of waste water per day. The plant comprises two parallel trains with segregated recycle lines so that a side-by-side comparison could be conducted. Two products were applied to Train AT2, ACF-32 and a natural organic compound found in other applications to potentiate the sludge reduction capabilities of ACF-32. Train AT1 was left unseeded as a control.

Within 60 days, an average reduction in sludge of approximately 20% was observed from the treated train with a maximum reduction of 26% observed late in the latter part of the 60 day period. Between the 60th and 90th day of the trial some settling instability was observed as was typically observed in the transition from cold weather to warm weather operation. Once through the transition the plant quickly stabilized and again a sludge reduction was observed in the treated train, but for this time period was in the 12% to 16 % range. Upon further evaluation of the data and process, it was determined that there was some commingling of the supernatant from the digestors, leading to an inadvertent low-level seed of the control train. While the differential between the seeded and “control” trains had been reduced, a comparison to historical sludge production numbers indicated that both trains were generating on the order of 20% reduction, despite higher hydraulic and organic loadings in 2006.


Zutphen Sludge Reduction Trial



Sludge Wasted (Kg)




AT1

AT2

Average

Average/day

1 Jan to 13 March

250,597

252,883

251,740

3496

14 March to 16 July

319,136

319,136

319,136

2574

% Reduction

26.4%

Table 3 – Sludge Reduction Efficiencies at Zutphen

Colombia

Ecological Laboratories’ Representative in South America, BluePlanet, was contacted by Empresas Publicas to see if it might be possible to reduce the odors associated with the operation of their anaerobic digestors and also improve the VSS reduction. The facility consisted of two anaerobic digestors of 7,900 M3 each. The average flow rate was 1.8 M3 per second giving an average HRT of 21 days. The VSS reduction being achieved prior to the addition of ACF-32 was approximately 30% for both reactors.

Figure 4 - Anaerobic Digestors at Empresas Publicas

The reactors were dosed at rate of 12 mg/L based on the volume of the reactors on the first day followed by dosages of 4 mg/L once per week for the next four weeks and then 1.5 mg/L once per week thereafter on a maintenance basis.

Six weeks after the initial dosage VSS reduction had been increased to 37% vs a target of 50% reduction with significant reductions in odors in and around the plant. The improvement allowed the plant to handle the existing load without the immediate addition of a third reactor.

Hod Hasharon - Israel

The City of Hod Hasharon operates an activated sludge system with anaerobic digestors to reduce the sludge volume before disposal. Average daily flow into the plant is approximately 25,000 M3/day. Overall performance efficiency of the plant is excellent. Based on results achieved in the anaerobic digestors at Pusan and Empresas Publicas, the Operations Staff at Hod Hasharon made a decision to see if similar results could be achieved in their plant. Unlike the other plants, Hod Hasharon was also interested in whether or not an increase in biogas production could be realized since they recovered the gas and used as a fuel source.

Compared to historical values from the previous 15 month operating period, during for the first three months of product treatment, with a 1.8% increase in loading to the plant based on a hydraulic and organic basis, the amount of sludge removed from the plant was reduced by 18% with a concurrent increase in biogas of 11.3%. There is a fairly good correlation between the reduction in VSS and the increase in biogas production, making it reasonable to assume that the increase in biogas production is a result of the improved VSS reduction efficiency.

Current treatment, during the summer of 2006, has obtained even better results in the effluent properties of TSS, BOD etc. with sludge reduction over 20%, along with a significant reduction in odor.

Table 4 - Operating Data from Hod Hasharon

 

WAS m3

RAS m3

Sewage in m3

Dry Sludge

% SOLIDS

SOLIDS Tons

Solids Vs WAS

BIO-GAS

1/28/2004

32745

255870

796800

858

16.20%

139

0.42%

126635

2/28/2004

28593

243050

738833

775.5

16.60%

129

0.45%

106633

3/28/2004

32289

212910

774194

874.5

16.10%

141

0.44%

115413

4/28/2004

37522

238970

746850

759

15.60%

118

0.32%

112470

5/28/2004

36870

230610

756214

1056

14.80%

156

0.42%

111817

6/28/2004

36847

218740

730080

924

13.50%

125

0.34%

119430

7/28/2004

32969

193520

644940

858

14.20%

122

0.37%

159154

8/28/2004

35870

212240

695370

1056

15.50%

164

0.46%

131719

9/28/2004

35351

213870

677590

924

14.70%

136

0.38%

150030

10/28/2004

37845

231090

730670

1023

15.00%

153

0.41%

147219

11/28/2004

29630

182340

602680

957

15.80%

151

0.51%

138930

12/28/2004

34018

265340

742290

957

16.10%

154

0.45%

140585

1/28/2005

31392

332910

715640

924

15.60%

144

0.46%

140864

2/28/2005

33830

345860

755250

825

16.00%

132

0.39%

131488

3/28/2005

42207

365820

706748

924

15.30%

141

0.33%

142383

4/28/2005

49042

329610

763127

759

18.90%

143

0.29%

139350

5/28/2005

53732

324160

724080

759

19.20%

146

0.27%

151032

6/28/2005

48967

305420

715070

726

20.90%

152

0.31%

144330

7/28/2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8/28/2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/28/2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/28/2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hypothetical Mechanisms for Observed Reduction in Sludge Generation

When growing microorganisms in an aqueous organic medium the carbon contained in the organics can end up being incorporated into new biomass (heterotrophic uptake), cell byproducts such as biopolymers or enzymes, or carbon dioxide. In fermentation technology, it is not uncommon to improve yields of fermentation products, which can be byproducts of bacterial metabolism, such as xanthan gum or biomass such as yeast, through manipulation of the process or the biomass itself. There are numerous examples of this in the production of antibiotics and enzymes. Typically, if the biomass is the desired end product, the system whether a batch or continuous fermentation is operated at a high F/M ratio, which maximizes the yield of cells since the cells are in log growth more of the time. This is consistent with Monod Kinetics, which suggests that growth rate increases with increasing substrate concentration until it reaches a point where the population cannot grow any faster dues to limitations such as mass transport or inhibition.

At the other end of the spectrum, when the cells operate in a substrate poor environment, the majority of substrate is used to satisfy the cell maintenance energy and there is little left over for new cell synthesis. This phenomenon is utilized in the process design for extended aeration systems, which produce less sludge but typically at a higher energy cost.

Until now, there have been few documented cases of sludge reduction through bioaugmentation but based on the example of the fermentation industry, there was always reasons to believe that sludge reduction was possible through biomass manipulation. Initial observations of sludge reduction were made serendipitously during programs in which bioaugmentation was used to enhance the reduction of refractory organics or enhance the overall efficiency of the systems with respect to organic removal efficiencies normally on the basis of BOD or COD reduction.

In most cases, some percentage of organic removal efficiency was achieved resulting in an equilibrium concentration of organics equivalent to that of the effluent in most suspended growth systems, especially those operating as CSTRs. Just as biomass in a fermentation would show lower yields of biomass when operated in a substrate poor environment, so does the biomass in a suspended growth system operating at a lower equilibrium F/M resulting in a lower yield coefficient for the system.

It also appears possible through bioaugmentation, along with the addition of natural supplements containing humic acids, that we can also enhance the cell digestion process.

We have certainly demonstrated the effectiveness and market potentials in our European trials for odor control and sludge reduction at municipal wastewater treatment facilities. We are in the final stages, and we are confident of the out-come, and therefore will be in a position to capitalize on these successful trials by mid-year. Projecting the business opportunity based on sludge reduction in the European domestic sewage market alone, our near-term target would be to take our success in Holland to the balance of Western Europe, and then expand to Eastern Europe, Asia, the Middle-East, and Central and South America. Similar business could be possible in urban areas (municipal treatment plants) in your market, or on a smaller scale in village septic lagoons and aeration ponds.