Waste water flows from the production area to the collection tank by a gravity and is pumped up to the aeration tank, and pumped thereafter to the clarifier.
Objectives of the study
To reduce the parameters of effluent as follows:
Parameter
Current
Standard required
COD
4211 mg/L
150 mg/L
BOD
2725 mg/L
50 mg/L
TSS
1276 mg/L
50 mg/L
FOG
612 mg/L
5 mg/L
PO4
71 mg/L
15 mg/L
NH4
310 mg/L
5 mg/L
SVI
452 mg/L
150 mg/L
To eliminate the bad odor of effluent, and of the sludge tank.
To remove the 65 cm thick floating layer on the sludge tank.
RESULTS
A dosage plan using Aqua Clean was devised and implemented on The 16th of May 2001, the results were monitored, and the following are the findings.
Parameters
Parameter
16/5
16/6
3/7
9/9
16/9
COD
4122
1618
630
293
107
BOD
2725
779
275
46
12
TSS
1276
760
311
153
64
FOG
612
367
5.3
1.1
0.3
PO4
71
48
3.6
0.26
0.1
NH4
310
187.3
120.44
13.45
2.1
Bad Smell
One week after the starting date of the treatment, the bad smell was hardly traceable, and as of the 28th of May (12 days after treatment) and through the entire duration of the treatment no bad odor was detected.
The floating layer on the sludge tank.
Thickness (cm)
16/5
16/6
3/7
9/9
16/9
65
32
0.5
000
000
CONCLUSION
The usage of Aqua Clean was effective in reducing all wastewater parameters to the limits set forth.
The smell and floating layer of sludge were both eliminated.
One month after the starting date of the trial, the color of the effluent has turned into a sort of pinky color for two weeks and returned to clear water color thereafter. We do believe that the reason for that change of color was the highly active purple bacteria in the first four weeks when there was a high concentration of hydrogen sulfide in both the aeration and sludge tank.
The customer was given two plans to choose from: one for 60 days and one for120 days. For economical reasons, the customer has decided to go for the120 days trial and save about 30% of the cost.